When Indices Are Cut: What Withdrawals Teach about Risk-Control Index Design

In a perfect world, the set of indices underlying a fixed index annuity (FIA) would remain the same throughout the products life-span. Advisers would do their research, make suggestions, and continue to track the very same set of indices.

In truth, nevertheless, carriers in some cases withdraw an index from additional investment, citing “capability issues.” This can cause frustration and suffering amongst consultants and raise questions from investors, specifically when they have actually put significant effort into comprehending an index that has actually been delivering good returns.

How can advisors describe to their customers that, irritating though it may seem, carriers are in reality acting properly by making such decisions?

Both the index and the provider sponsor ought to want to prevent this scenario– the carrier for the sake of its end customers, and the index sponsor for the stability of its index.

The Different Entities Involved in an FIA.

The capability of an index is not a mandatory number, but rather a guideline quantity at which the needed hedging activity may have a non-negligible result on index efficiency. When it comes to an FIA index, capability is approximated by the hedge service provider at the time it agrees to begin offering the choices to the provider.

Specifying Capacity

When a carrier issues an FIA, it typically engages one or more banks as hedge providers to use the alternatives on the indices that make up the FIA The hedge companies trade the parts of these FIA indices in the markets, duplicating the indices efficiency and “delta hedging” the choices they have actually sold to the carrier. The figure below highlights the relationship.

* When the index sponsor is a bank, these are usually the same entity.If this hedging activity comprises a substantial portion of the everyday trading in a specific element of an FIA index– for instance, a stock or an exchange-traded fund (ETF)– it might have a material impact on the parts rate. If, state, a hedger needs to buy $100 countless a stock, and the average everyday volume traded is $200 million, the hedging would represent 50% of the typical day-to-day liquidity. This hedging activity might feed back into the level of the FIA index itself, potentially to the hinderance of the performance of the FIA– and the retirees who have actually bought it.

Hitting Capacity

In a broad sense, capability refers to the properties under management (AUM) beyond which a method can not attain efficiency in time matching its specified return objectives or expectations. Reaching capability is a factor a hedge fund might close a fund to brand-new financiers, so securing the interests of existing investors. In the case of the risk-control indices utilized in FIAs, the considerations are comparable, although not identical.

How might issues happen?

And what about altering market conditions? The risk-control indices used in FIAs tend to be made up of other indices, ETFs, futures, and stocks. Component liquidity can alter markedly with time. An underlying ETF may see minimized volumes if it underperforms and financiers withdraw; or an underlying future might end up being very finely traded, with decreased open interest. In both cases, the drop in liquidity can reduce the capacity of the risk-control index.

This is most likely driven by strong performance of one or more of the risk-control indices used in the FIA, drawing in inflows. Everyone is pleased, till the required hedge amount of one of the FIA indices approaches the capacity of that index.

ICLN: An Illustration

While this example applies to an ETF, not an FIA, it shows how altering market conditions and demand can produce severe capability issues in index-linked items.

In the ETF world, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ticker: ICLN) provides a fine example of an index capability problem. The ETF was introduced in 2008, but as investors reacted to the sustainability story and clean energy ended up being a key effort of the Joseph Biden administration, the US ETFs AUM surged from around $700 million to about $5 billion, while the matching European variation tracking the very same index likewise grew to around $5 billion. The ETF was likewise a popular underlying for US structured items, creating a concealed demand for the stocks. The problem was that the underlying index only had 30 constituents, two of which were little, illiquid stocks noted in New Zealand.

Style Matters

When it came time to rebalance, the ETF required to offer 40 to 50 times the daily liquidity of these 2 stocks. That would have driven substantial cost motions. After assessments, the index sponsor, S&P, took an extreme step: It upgraded the index and increased the number of stocks to a target of 100.

If index capability is not a pre-set, hardcoded quantity, how can carriers best prevent future capability concerns when selecting risk-control indices?

The need for an index, its efficiency, and market conditions all alter with time, challenging product contractors and their hedge service providers to guarantee provision of an index over the annuities longer time scales. When performing due diligence on proposed risk-control indices, providers need to take detailed elements of index design into consideration.

If you liked this post, dont forget to register for the Enterprising Investor.

All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they need to not be construed as financial investment suggestions, nor do the viewpoints expressed always reflect the views of CFA Institute or the authors employer.

With suitable examination, they can maximize the possibilities of avoiding capacity problems in the future.

Index capability depends mostly on the liquidity of the underlying instruments: normally other indices, Stocks, futures, and etfs. Mindful choice is for that reason necessary. But index capacity also depends upon the weighting system that assigns to these instruments, the rebalancing system that carries out these weightings, and the risk-control mechanism that preserves the indexs volatility at its target level.

Image credit: © Getty Images/ GoodLifeStudio

Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members

The risk-control indices used in FIAs tend to be made up of other indices, ETFs, futures, and stocks. Index capacity depends primarily on the liquidity of the underlying instruments: typically other indices, ETFs, stocks, and futures. Index capacity likewise depends on the weighting system that assigns to these instruments, the rebalancing mechanism that executes these weightings, and the risk-control mechanism that keeps the indexs volatility at its target level.

* When the index sponsor is a bank, these are typically the very same entity.If this hedging activity makes up a substantial portion of the everyday trading in a particular element of an FIA index– for example, a stock or an exchange-traded fund (ETF)– it might have a material effect on the parts price. Everybody is delighted, until the needed hedge amount of one of the FIA indices approaches the capability of that index.

Jay Watson
Jay Watson is managing director and head of analytics at The Index Standard, the leading provider of index evaluation scores and projections. He was formerly handling director and head of multi-asset index structuring EMEA at Barclays in London. He has a doctorate in theoretical physics from Oxford University.

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report expert learning (PL) credits made, consisting of material on Enterprising Investor. Members can tape credits quickly using their online PL tracker.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.